Used when electronic evidence — phones, laptops, servers, email or chat records — must be preserved, examined and presented in a form a court or arbitral tribunal will accept.
Mobile Forensics•Computer Forensics•Electronic Evidence•WhatsApp Examination•Email Forensics
Bombay High CourtNCLT MumbaiArbitrationCyber Cell references
Mobile Forensics•WhatsApp & Signal Examination•Deleted Data Recovery•Expert Testimony
Bombay High CourtSessions CourtFamily Court
Computer Forensics•Server & Cloud Imaging•Email Forensics•Network Incident Analysis•Mobile Forensics
NCLTArbitrationSEBI matters
Mobile Forensics•Social Media Evidence•Cyber Fraud Investigation•Evidence Preservation
Court experience not yet established
eDiscovery•Computer Forensics•Email & Cloud•Large-volume Review•Expert Testimony
Bombay High CourtSIAC / MCIA arbitrationNCLT
A report can be relied on when the examiner follows a documented method, preserves the original evidence, and is available to testify. The platform records the examiner's court experience so you can choose accordingly.
Often, depending on the device, the backup state and how much time has passed. A competent examiner will tell you the likelihood before quoting, and will preserve the device first.
For a forensically sound image, yes, at least briefly. Many examiners perform on-site imaging so the device never leaves your custody.
We have seen orders, reports or references establishing that the professional has given evidence or filed expert reports before an Indian court or tribunal. It is a factual tier, not an endorsement of outcome.
No. Your description stays private until you request a quote from a specific professional, and even then only the scope you choose to share is disclosed.